Discussion:
Format allocation unit size
(too old to reply)
Terry
2004-06-30 09:12:08 UTC
Permalink
Any benefit to be gained from using a different allocation unit size to the
default? pros & cons.

Regards
Terry
Arek Iskra [MVP]
2004-06-30 12:36:21 UTC
Permalink
I'd say it depends. I prefer to make default unit size on NTFS partitions as
4KB.

Check out these links if you need basic guidelines:
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/all/reskit/en-us/prkc_fil_lxty.asp

http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-6268-5034399.html

One thing worth noting is that compression is not supported on volumes which
clusters are > 4KB
--
Arek Iskra
Microsoft MVP for Windows Server
Post by Terry
Any benefit to be gained from using a different allocation unit size to the
default? pros & cons.
Regards
Terry
Terry
2004-06-30 13:15:01 UTC
Permalink
Hi Arek,
Thank for the links. I have have used the default 4K.
Regards
Terry
Post by Arek Iskra [MVP]
I'd say it depends. I prefer to make default unit size on NTFS partitions as
4KB.
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/Windows/XP/all/reskit/en-us/prkc_fil_lxty.asp
Post by Arek Iskra [MVP]
http://techrepublic.com.com/5100-6268-5034399.html
One thing worth noting is that compression is not supported on volumes which
clusters are > 4KB
--
Arek Iskra
Microsoft MVP for Windows Server
Post by Terry
Any benefit to be gained from using a different allocation unit size to
the
Post by Terry
default? pros & cons.
Regards
Terry
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...